How has social media changed consumer behaviour during the decision-making process?
Table of Contents
Thanks to the advancement of the internet in the 2000s, web 2.0 and social media’s concepts were declared. Web 2.0 had been defined as the purpose of dissatisfaction. Several as overhyped buzzword marketing would see it. Whatever that was being advanced confessed such a word which denotes the continuum of the 2.0 Web dynamic platform by a static content which permits everybody to encourage and make content communication, community and collaboration. 2.0 Web had various Apps kinds like as Social network, Blogs, as journals that are online; that are special webs that allow people exchanging own content; Communities of Content, by name webs which manage and spread out some content; boards of Forum, as webs to exchange thoughts; aggregators content, that are Apps which eligible people customising the website content people feel confirmation (Voramontri, and Klieb, 2019). Widely this phenomenon has changed people’s way of communicating, making decisions, socialising, learning, entertaining and shopping themselves. It was important for this reason to know how consumer behaviour can be changed by social media to understand better social media or 2.0 web as modern component marketing and adopt business strategies according to it. In this essay it has analysed how models are expanded by social media and can be made more complex. Also it considers the decision making process. It would be taken considering two various questions of research, also understanding how many brand ethical picture and online businesses may influence the consumer behaviour’ and how influencer marketing influences the consumer purchasing behaviour and DMP, other users bio data and social network (Nash, 2019).
How Social Media changed the Decision-Making Process (DMP)
Marketers, in order to check the steps by which consumers go when consumers buy a thing, made the customer model of decision making process, that clarify 5 stages at the start: need justify, knowledge searching, alternatives’ evaluation, buying, buying post evaluation. The main target of business is serving and satisfying their buyers, also its impact on brand awareness by social media, loyalty and sales. Also it has complicated the process of purchasing behaviour theory as the customer’ behaviour has not only been impacted by the channels of trade but by only modern online platforms. Benetoli, et al., (2018) Proposes a Responded and based model on framework. Buyers of the traditional marketing mix can be influenced like an advertisement on television, magazines, and radio networks etc. also it can be influenced by some uncontrollable stimuli such as perception, culture, value etc. With social media and 2.0 web though, extends scheme to marketing online mix controllable objectives like google emails, banners, web usability etc. and also to social media solutions, which are uncontrollable online marketing objectives (Muninger et al., 2019).
Therefore, customers can increase their address for various kinds of social media conducting their knowledge research and may get their buying decision. Marketers concerning attempting to understand the buying process by social media, (Cooley and Parks 2019) have shown that the previous buying funnel model to denote that social media changes consumer decision making process in various ways.
To consider connects the steps from awareness to buy and it is also involved in many major factors such as reputation brand, applicability, performance etc. In traditional media comparison, and on social media, consideration and awareness are both prompted and valid means, and simultaneously almost act. 2.0 web may impact the buy funnel by creating the provided information more transparent and accessible and also it has identified the constant feedback loop’s value, like online content flows and is dynamic in both ways. Muninger et al., (2019) has also stretched the social feedback cycle’s importance as a function for buying evaluation. Through traditional media television, newspaper, radio , customers can be aware of services or products and then identify products on the internet at google (Zheng et al., 2018).
Mouth’s word has no cost, it is said that it is self-contained and self-generating, and it also shows itself with the help of social media more and more, where the data may at distance and quickly spread. Mouth’s word and Reviews were a method that makes decisions in an easy way and data less confuses and credible higher. The web of Social has made it easy and fast for everyone to equally data, find products and seek and some services within a worldwide alternatives’ range, and also tell other people about their own experience after and before buy. The major goal of marketers should be to make customers speak positively as a result, about customers buying experience and to increase the spreading about the content between some communities (Hossain et al., 2018).
The importance of an ethical image and its impact on consumers’ DMP
It is said that business ethical consumerism has been an important influence. To the past it has compared, now customers may be in easy way get info about a businesses, like newspapers and magazines not only by traditional media but also reading, online, forums, articles, and what users speak on social media. Thanked to internet persons may know about the businesses’ webs and may look for customer’s page of policy, also they may search for clearance from third party firms which hold organisations to highly standard of social accounts or although they may emails direct to the organisation. That advancing concentration on ethical problems had led products to portray themselves as green, sustainable and responsible socially. Further, as those problems impact consumer behaviour in time of buying, firms may more and more promote their social responsibilities CSR as it can affect firms loss or profit account. It was defined by Saura, et al., (2021) to seek understanding if investments in ethics pay off and in CSR at a corporate level. They also said that that was always best practice behaving independently ethically of the daily base effect it can have on customers. Whatever, it is suggested by study that customer ethicality is perceived, it also affects the product loyalty in a positive way and may also facilitate consumer retention, save upcoming encouragement recommendations and purchases. Also this study was made by (Reichstein, and Brusch, 2019) likely to help that idea. Also that research may suggest that customers care about the corporate behaviour ethicality and that customers trust they may help promote it by being willing to give big rates for similar and ethical products, describing the will to pay low rates for the product of an unbecoming brand. Although between the consumer purchase behaviour and CSR there were not more links, the data yet is agreed that organisations should continue with its ethical marketing and CSR policies in order to influence shareholders, wider community and government to be concerned actively with good ethical behaviour (Seraphin, and Green, 2019).
How social networks changed consumer behaviour
Social media’s diffusion had changed selling and purchasing techniques during the previous ten years. Through YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter, customers may be aware of various services and products and they may distribute their experiences through online comments. It has remarkable influence on customers’ brands perception by user-generated content, choice of brand and new customer acquisition. The fashion market, many customers consume their money to keep their wardrobe fresh. It is clear that fashion has a major role in lifestyle. Social media is linked closely to the changing constant preference of customer and had made it possible for customers keep on updated with the fresh fashion trends. It has analysed by Loxton et al., (2020) the effect of influencers’ in different steps of consumer decision process, and it also has told that it all begins from the attractive pictures customers watch on social media and also on fashion blogs. They has also realised that the necessity for the brand product by given celebrities on YouTube, Twitter, Instagram and Facebook etc., see reviews about that and eventually these are led to buy it. When discussing social networks, how parasocial interaction (PSI) may be a concept which can be considered. It has explained by PSI that the connection between social media interactions and social media users. It has also represented by PSI an involvement interpersonal of the media users with what users use. The involvement has regarded to seek for guidance from a media user, watching media person friendly, imagining also being part of a best community and to desire meeting media users. It is said that In context marketing, Ross et al., (2019) has defined the PSI as an experience of illusionary, such which customer communicate with personas representations mediated celebrities, presenters, or roles as if they can be engaged and presented in a reciprocal connection. The study revealed that the purchase intentions and luxury product perceptions for the customers who look at the video blog viewing luxury brands, were higher than the customer who can’t watch the video (Ioanas, 2020).
It is concluded that the main goal of this essay was to research how the appearance of social media impacted on consumer behaviour, and further specified, looking at how the consumer purchasing behaviour is changed by the internet during the process of decision making. On the two various means, the process of decision making shows the same brand publicity and also the authors find out those blogs generated as purchase intentions and higher brand attitudes. This has been described by blogs’ higher interaction para social with its customers. People feel the necessity for unbiased information and transparency, created from customers that looked like them sometimes than from a sponsored corporate online existence. As a result, the usage of social networks requires marketers to concentrate more on developing a good relationship.
Benetoli, A., Chen, T.F. and Aslani, P., 2018. How patients’ use of social media impacts their interactions with healthcare professionals. Patient education and counseling, 101(3), pp.439-444.
Cooley, D. and Parks-Yancy, R., 2019. The effect of social media on perceived information credibility and decision making. Journal of Internet Commerce, 18(3), pp.249-269.
Hossain, M.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Chan, C., Standing, C. and Olanrewaju, A.S., 2018. Sharing political content in online social media: A planned and unplanned behaviour approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), pp.485-501.
Ioanas, E., 2020. Social media and its impact on consumers behavior. Jurnal Analisa Kesehatan, 1(1), pp.1-1.
Loxton, M., Truskett, R., Scarf, B., Sindone, L., Baldry, G. and Zhao, Y., 2020. Consumer behaviour during crises: preliminary research on how coronavirus has manifested consumer panic buying, herd mentality, changing discretionary spending and the role of the media in influencing behaviour. Journal of risk and financial management, 13(8), p.166.
Muninger, M.I., Hammedi, W. and Mahr, D., 2019. The value of social media for innovation: A capability perspective. Journal of Business Research, 95, pp.116-127.
Nash, J., 2019. Exploring how social media platforms influence fashion consumer decisions in the UK retail sector. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal.
Reichstein, T. and Brusch, I., 2019. The decision‐making process in viral marketing—A review and suggestions for further research. Psychology & Marketing, 36(11), pp.1062-1081.
Ross, B., Pilz, L., Cabrera, B., Brachten, F., Neubaum, G. and Stieglitz, S., 2019. Are social bots a real threat? An agent-based model of the spiral of silence to analyse the impact of manipulative actors in social networks. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(4), pp.394-412.
Saura, J.R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. and Palacios-Marqués, D., 2021. From user-generated data to data-driven innovation: A research agenda to understand user privacy in digital markets. International Journal of Information Management, p.102331.
Seraphin, H. and Green, S., 2019. The significance of the contribution of children to conceptualising the destination of the future. International Journal of Tourism Cities.
Voramontri, D. and Klieb, L., 2019. Impact of social media on consumer behaviour. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 11(3), pp.209-233.
Zheng, B., Liu, H. and Davison, R.M., 2018. Exploring the relationship between corporate reputation and the public’s crisis communication on social media. Public Relations Review, 44(1), pp.56-64.